🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include events where African descendants are paid to talk to white audiences about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the Britain, Deutschland, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has evolved since those days, placing less emphasis on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the month is celebrated is a indication of the political moment. How it develops is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we saw the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator gains confidence to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a source of worry. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the EU as a entirety.

In the America, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A drive to erase Black history and narrative from the records is under way. One of the political figure's early administrative commands focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the month represents how little it can be effective if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content festivities of historical achievements, rather than confronting the situation of the current era. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is needed. An academic expert, a prof at an educational institution, put it best when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just discontinue events including Black History Month entirely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an foundation that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not shy away from governmental matters, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves mere awareness of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Establishments who celebrate it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the threats that affect everyone if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and reactive. Maybe an total re-identification is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.